Is it better to side with roche or iorveth?

In terms of comparing them, people seem to say that Roche’s path is a bit more dark, more political, and more about humans. Meanwhile, Iorveth’s path is said to be more fantasy-ish, less dark, and less about humans.

If you give him the sword, Iorveth will actually treat Geralt as a friend if his path is chosen. If you punch him in the throat, he will be overtaken by Roche’s men and captured. (If you join the Squirrels later, he will obviously not be present.)

Rescuing Triss not only allows you to have some fun in the camp, but it also allows Triss to accuse Síle de Tansarville, another powerful mage, of being the puppetmaster behind Foltest’s death. Saskia, however, remains under Eilhart’s thrall, leading to a later confrontation between witcher and dragon.

Giving Iorveth his sword is The hidden, neutral witcher move. Even if you’re going to go down Roche’s path, it would be a neutral move to arm a man facing a battle; to keep his weapon from him means you’re favoring his enemy, hence taking the side of the enemy.

The Scoia’tael aren’t exactly good guys or villains

They are a guerrilla army of elves, dwarves, and halflings. What began as a protest movement of rebel elves fighting against non-human discrimination, evolved into a violent force.

At this time, it was simply not possible to “just” create another quest that would replace it and we had to finish and polish the rest of the game. It’s perfectly natural that Parts of the game are cut in development, and in this case it unfortunately hit a part that Iorveth had a big role in.

Saskia is featured in The Witcher: Matters of Conscience comic released with the Hearts of Stone expansion for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt on October 13, 2015. Events are set between the second and the third game in 1271.

Triss is overall less abrasive than Yennefer, and provides a simple yet stable life for Geralt if the two end up together. Yennefer, on the other hand, offers a chance to see Geralt’s true love and their delightfully complicated story.

Nothing from the original Witcher game carries over.

Witcher 2’s save import didn’t actually make a lot of difference in your gameplay.

Iorveth is said to be Aen Seidhe. Aen Seidhe say humans first appeared during the conjunction of the spheres, which happened 1,500 years before the events in the books [1]. This would make Iorveth At least 1500 years old, unless the descendants of Aen Seidhe are also Aen Seidhe.

Chapter I:

They say all elves are beautiful, that they are born thus. In Iorveth’s case someone set out to change this, marking his face with an ugly scar that The elf partially hid beneath a crimson headscarf.

Dijkstra Rules Novigrad: This happens if you complete Reason of State and kill Roche. Dijkstra is a pretty cool dude after all, but the war will continue to wage on. Side with Roche: If you side with Roche and Radovid obviously would have to die for this, then Temeria peacefully reclaims their land and Nilfgaard wins.

Yes, I meant both. If elves age like humans it wouldn’t work. If they age like elves in other works of fiction, as in slowly, they could complete both training and the trials and still be just as “young” as someone just out of training.

Because of that, Many elves were members of the Scoia’tael guerrillas allied with Nilfgaard During the empire’s second invasion of the Northern Kingdoms.

Scoia’tael were allied with Nilfgaard And used by Emperor Emhyr var Emreis for diversion, as well as support for the Nilfgaardian Army. In exchange for their support, Emperor Emhyr var Emreis gave the elves Dol Blathanna as their own, independent state, and made Enid an Gleanna its queen.

Iorweth. The commander of the Scoia’tael, mostly elven guerrilla fighters who have been radicalized by the hatred and mistreatment of non-humans, Iorweth (or Iorveth) is only briefly mentioned in the books but Plays a major role in The Witcher 2.

Triss won’t die either way. If you free Triss you’ll undermine Nilfgaard’s plot to blame all sorceresses on the king slaying. Only the guilty ones (e.g. Sila) will be pursued. But You won’t get a chance to help Saskia.

Iorveth is actually from the books. He’s only mentioned once in 3rd or 4th book of the saga. Theres a scene with elf in a prison, and he’s described as one from scattered commando of Iorveth.

Saskia is A dragon with polymorphism ability. Her real name is Saesenthessis. She is also a daughter of Borch Three Jackdaws – also a dragon but unlike her father she is not a Golden Dragon and therefore can only assume one human form.

Letho’s Fate

You can either kill Letho or let him live. You don’t gain anything by killing him though, but you can have “the final battle” which is compulsory for many games. If you spare him, then as the journal says his fate is “story for another time”.

Witcher 1 does not affect Witcher 3 in any way.

Besides, even if you don’t go save her yourself, (spoiler) Letho saves her for you(I know it’s rather shameful but it’s better than nothing). So, Triss lives, and at the same time Anais is saved.

Witcher 3 Interrogation Questions & Answers

Sparing his life leads Aryan and Geralt to cross paths yet again, only this time in the dungeons of La Valette. Aryan helps Geralt escape. Geralt then comes across Aryan once more in Loc Muinne.

Triss won’t die either way. If you free Triss you’ll undermine Nilfgaard’s plot to blame all sorceresses on the king slaying. Only the guilty ones (e.g. Sila) will be pursued. But you won’t get a chance to help Saskia.

If you don’t save Triss because ‘she will be saved anyway’ the consequences will be no Brotherhood and an even more extensive slaughter in Loc Muinne.